Bridge Over Troubled Waters: Uniting Restorationist and Evangelical Views of Baptism (Part 2)

Baptism stands as a pivotal sacrament within the Christian tradition, a rite of passage that has sparked theological discourse since the earliest days of the Church. 

In my previous article on baptism, I demonstrated how saving faith apart from water baptism was somewhat foreign to the New Testament church. While baptism was not a hard condition for salvation (as seen in Cornelius’s household), it was depicted as an occasion tightly associated with salvation; where faith was catalyzed through both the written Word (the Gospel) and the illustrated Word (the water).

In this follow-up article, I turn to the early church fathers, particularly those in the Pre-Nicene and early Post-Nicene era, to delve into their understanding of this sacrament. These fathers stood closer to the apostolic era than any other. Their writings, steeped in the apostolic tradition, carry a weight of authority that shaped the hermeneutics and practice of the Church for centuries. Their teachings on the two primary sacraments broadly represent the consensus of the early church; the same church that ecumenically declared the canon of scripture that we hold in our hands. Therefore, we can’t just ignore them. In fact, we should be cautious embracing Biblical interpretations about the sacraments that are novel and foreign to them.

In studying these fathers, we find that they held a very high view of baptism, typically linking it directly to the grace of God. To them, baptism was a normative means of saving grace. Yet, many of them also acknowledged exceptions to this rule, or means of saving grace that were conveyed without the watery plunge.   

For the remainder of this article, we will consider selected texts from these fathers that support baptism as the normative means of converting grace, as well as those that suggest exceptions to this rule. This will paint a comprehensive picture of early Christian thought on this sacramental cornerstone.

Hermas ( 80 A.D.)

The Shepherd of Hermas, written around 80 AD, is an early Christian literary work. It consists of visions, commandments, and parables granted to Hermas, a former slave, emphasizing repentance and correction of sins. 

Justin Martyr (c. 110 – 165)

Justin Martyr (c. 100 – 165) was a significant early Christian apologist and philosopher. Born in Palestine, he engaged with Greek philosophy and defended Christianity against charges of atheism and hostility to the Roman state. 

Irenaeus (c. 120 – 205)

Irenaeus was born in Asia Minor and became the bishop of Lyon. His work “Against Heresies” refuted gnosticism and contributed to the development of an authoritative canon of Scriptures and the authority of the episcopal office.

Clement (c. 150 – 200)

Clement of Alexandria was a Christian theologian and missionary to the Hellenistic world. He used Greek philosophy, especially Plato, to elucidate Christian doctrine. 

Origen (c. 182 – 254)

Origen, born in Alexandria, was an early Christian scholar, ascetic, and theologian. His greatest work, the “Hexapla,” synthesized six versions of the Old Testament. He significantly shaped early Christian thought and biblical scholarship.

Tertullian (c. 160 – 220)

Tertullian, an important theologian and moralist, initiated ecclesiastical Latin and influenced Western Christianity. His works include writings on Montanism and moral theology. He is one of the Latin Apologists of the 2nd century.

Cyprian (c. 200 – 258)

Cyprian, as bishop of Carthage, led North African Christians during Rome’s persecution. He became the first bishop-martyr of Africa. His principles of church discipline emphasized the authority of the church, bishops, and acceptance of unworthy members.

Ambrose (c. 337 – 397)

Ambrose, bishop of Milan, played a crucial role in the conversion of Augustine. His theological writings and hymns greatly influenced Western Christianity.

Gregory Nazianz (c. 329 – 390)

Gregory Nazianz, a theologian, bishop, and orator, was a key figure in the Nicene Creed formulation. His eloquence and defense of the Trinity left a lasting impact.

John Chrysostom (c. 349 – 407)

John Chrysostom, known as the “Golden Mouth,” was an influential preacher and bishop of Constantinople. His homilies emphasized moral living and social justice.

St. Cyril of Jerusalem (c. A.D. 350)

St. Cyril of Jerusalem, as bishop of Jerusalem, focused on catechesis and the Eucharist. His “Catechetical Lectures” provided instruction for new converts.

Basil the Great (375 AD)

Basil the Great, a theologian, bishop, and monastic founder, emphasized communal living and asceticism. His works shaped Eastern Christian spirituality.

St. Augustine (419 AD)

St. Augustine, bishop of Hippo, wrote extensively on theology, grace, and original sin. His “Confessions” and “City of God” remain influential.

St. Fulgence of Ruspe (c. A.D. 524)

St. Fulgence of Ruspe, a bishop and theologian, defended orthodox Christianity against Arianism and other heresies.

In examining the views of the pre-Nicene and early post-Nicene Church Fathers, it becomes evident that they consistently held a high view of water baptism. They interpreted passages like 1 Peter 3:21, Acts 2:38, and John 3:5 quite literally, emphasizing that baptism is not merely a symbolic act but a powerful occasion (or means) through which God grants the gift of repentance, leading to forgiveness of sins and new life. However, they also recognized exceptions, including the “baptism of blood” (martyrdom for Christ) and the “baptism of desire” (explicit or implicit longing for baptism), which also lead to salvation even without the physical act of water baptism. This nuanced understanding aligns somewhat with the conclusions in my previous article.

Press the SUBSCRIBE button at the bottom to get emails when new articles publish!

Click the link to our FACEBOOK Group at the bottom. Come and join the conversation!

One thought on “Bridge Over Troubled Waters: Uniting Restorationist and Evangelical Views of Baptism (Part 2)

Leave a comment